Daily Kos

Lessons Learned from the Dean Campaign and the Past 7 Years

Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 09:24:06 AM PDT

In some diaries, people have said how the excitement of the Obama campaign reminded them of their first connection with the netroots, Howard Dean.  I guess there were lessons learned from that one:  how internet popularity didn't necessarily translate into votes, that at a certain point we needed to step away from our computers and get involved in our communities doing the work for the campaigns we support (never got a chance to do much unfortunately; Howard was out before California had its turn), and most importantly, to stay humble and hungry.  

The only thing I would add is that we progressives continue to stay involved in politics at all times, not only during elections.

I think progressives are much more prone to be disgusted with politics than repugs.  We tend to be more idealistic and sometimes more rigid that way.  It's like that old saw about sausage and legislation; we don't want to know how it's made. We also tend to have a more ambivalent relationship to authority and power, whereas Repugs have fewer qualms. We're also human; we get burnt out, I know I have.  We have to get over that and realize that it's our responsibility to stay involved and to keep watch over our representatives, especially the ones we elect.  

As much as we want to blame that other 51 percent (or less) that voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004, we have to realize that we're partly to blame as well.  As a group, we had the numbers, but for whatever reason we didn't have the time, energy or interest to turn out and vote.  There were a number of reasons for this: we didn't have a candidate that excited us, and the structure of the Democratic Party back then was even more heavily tilted toward the corporate oligarchy (although that's slowly changing now with the power of the netroots). Add to that the perceived mismanagement, corruption, and undue corporate influence-peddling during the Democratic reign of Congress during the '80s and '90s.

Thus, much of the Republican power grab in the past few decades was facilitated by the fact that we helped create the conditions in which it could occur.  We were apathetic or had short attention spans and we didn't hold OUR representatives accountable when they caved to special corporate interests and the newly empowered Repugs.  We have to do better than that.  If the general public just sees Democrats as just another party run by big-business and lobbyists, can you blame them if they can discern no difference between us and the Repugs? That's part of the '90s that I don't want to go back to.  

I think the Obama campaign is a once-in-a-lifetime, but what do after he's elected?  No candidate in the near future has his star power, so will we be able to rally around them just as enthusiastically as we have for Barack? We have to find a way to keep engaged with politics (even with lower-wattage politicians) and stay organized, without devolving into the single-interest politics of the past (vote for her because she's a woman, vote for him because he's African American). We have to make sure that the party reflects progressive values by supporting progressive candidates directly through Act Blue instead of the DSCC or DCCC. OK, the DNC still gets my support because of Howard Dean and his 50-state strategy.

As a party and as citizens, we have to be better and do better, otherwise the public cynicism and dissatisfaction with politics and Washington D.C. will be justified.  This is the same discontent that brought Howard Dean from outsider to the head of the DNC; to take the power away from Washington elite (the Penns and McCauliffe's of the world) and brought it to the grass roots to all the 50 states.  It's the same anger that makes people think that all politicians no matter what party are the same; they're all crooks, serve corporate interests instead of the people who vote for them, are only there to enrich themselves.

I hope that we've also learned the lessons of the past 7 years; that it's important to stay involved in politics no matter how difficult and ugly it gets, that having a Dem in the White House matters, that it's not just quantity but quality, that we need to vote for progressive Democrats who are working for the people not for self-interest or the interests of their corporate funders.  Even when we elect a Dem president and increase our numbers in Congress, we need to stay engaged in the process and let them know we expect them to reflect our values, that they work for us.  

Tags: Barack Obama, Howard Dean, Campaign, Endurance, Humility, Work (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 14 comments

  •  Here here!! (0+ / 0-)

    Here is a simple outline for CLinton backers:

    50 state Strategy.
    Dean started it. We need to continue it.

    Majority in House and Senate needed to get progressive legislation passed.

    Obama has a 50 state strategy..

    Clinton does not.

    Ergo.. my vote for Obama.

    Easy.

    http://www.wrapupafrica.com A skirt. A skill. A life saved.

    by librarianman on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 09:25:59 AM PDT

  •  Thanks! (0+ / 0-)

    I got active in politics because of Howard Dean.

    And, I was very angry when I saw how Democratic machine politics shot his campaign down in Iowa.  I saw how easy it was to buy votes in Iowa as a result of the Club for Growth campaign against Dean in that state and it has been difficult for me to respect an Iowan ever since.

  •  Its why we need open government. (0+ / 0-)

    One of the reason people do not stay engaged is that the process of governing is largely conducted in secret.

    Obama is opening a the door by a crack. Its not full-on open government but a significant first step. Then the public is going to demand more and more openness once they become familiar with the goings on. Thats how you begin to hold politicians accountable.

    The netroots movement is a pretty big first step. Then came the Dean campaign. Now the Obama campaign.

    Things will get better if we working at it.

    With him from the beginning, with him until the end.

    by brooklynbadboy on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 09:28:03 AM PDT

    •  couldn't agree more on this: (0+ / 0-)

      The only thing I would add is that we progressives continue to stay involved in politics at all times, not only during elections.

      That was the real lesson here in Washington.

      We were Howard's biggest delegation in 2004.  We'd been active for a year before the precinct caucuses in February, and fully expected a big victory until the Iowa collapse.  And we still came out to support Howard at the caucuses.

      Meanwhile, a whole bunch of previously-unseen people came to the precinct caucuses and signed in for Kerry.  While they stood around murmuring "electable, electable", the Dean people tried to convince others to join our side.  I know for a fact that I added a Dean delegate to our total in my precinct.

      After the caucuses, we hardly ever saw any of those Kerry people again.  Meanwhile, the Dean supporters volunteered in the Combined Campaign, made phone calls, doorbelled, and on and on and on.  The Dean people became the Kerry/Edwards campaign; the Kerry people vanished.

      And it's continued since then.  We may not have picked the same 2008 candidate(s) -- and some of us could never really get deeply behind any of them -- but every presidential candidate's local campaign was peopled with former Deaniacs.  And the state, county, and Legislative District Democratic organizations are stuffed with former Deaniacs.

      In Washington, the Dean campaign is the Democratic Party.

      The way to win is not to move to the right wing; the way to win is to move to the right policy. -- Nameless Soldier

      by N in Seattle on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 10:22:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks! (0+ / 0-)

    I got actively involved with politics because of Howard Dean.

    But, I was extremely angry when I saw how Democratic machine politics shot down his campaign in Iowa.

    And how easily Iowa voter were sold the anti-Dean campaign financed by Club for Groweth.

    I've never been able to respect anyone from Iowa ever since.

  •  I want to second this diary (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    N in Seattle

    And point out that this is what I, personally, so much admire about both Gore and Dean.  After being knocked out, in Gore's case by the Supreme Court Decision and by the absolutely horrendous behavior of the rioting republicans Gore picked himself up and went on to do some of the most profoundly important progressive organizing in human history--his work on Global Warming.  After being smashed down and out by the DLC and the Democratic insiders, with the help of a complicit Media, Dean went on to seize control of the DNC and to try to put into practice the smarter politics we've all been demanding--the 50 state strategy--the sucess of which we are only just starting to see.

    In both these cases these progressive leaders (and Dean isn't that progressive, neither) didn't take political office--even the highest political office--as the only goal in the fight. They recognized that the fight for progressive values happens at many levels and needs many different kinds of fighters. I contrast this with Nader and the Greens who supported him who continue to act as spoilers without doing the every day nuts and bolts organizing and fighting that our two party system really requires.  

    This kind of stick-to-itivness and determined working of the refs, working the system, working between elections is what is needed if we are ever to have an effective progressive movement in this country. Perhaps it will be led by Barack Obama. I hope so. But he can only lead if we are behind him, pushing at every level in every locality.

    aimai

  •  Tags (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    N in Seattle

    Tag faerie added commas to you tags to separate keywords

    (-8.12, -7.33)
    "I am not a politician, I only suffer the consequences." Peter Tosh

    by AndrewMC on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 09:32:46 AM PDT

  •  One Lesson (0+ / 0-)

    A candidate can't rely on netroots alone.  Obama has shown an ability to attract progressive-leaning voters who aren't part of netroots.  Barack Obama has built on Howard Dean's coalition.

    Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both

    by Anthony de Jesus on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 09:36:55 AM PDT

  •  One Thing I Forgot is that (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    boydog

    before the 50-state strategy, we used to have to rebuild the local Democratic campaign structure from scratch every time we had an election.  Instead of being able to plug into an existing support system, a candidate had to largely reinvent the wheel every time.

    Not only that, we wrote off entire areas or states (sounds familiar?) and didn't even try to campaign in some places.  As mentioned by Kos in Crashing the Gates, the pain of this was multiplied by the fact that  this created a lack of bench strength of strong Democratic candidates seeking higher office and also that the Repugs could spill out their message/propaganda unopposed, thus reinforcing their dominance and allowing the demonization of Dems as a party of tax and spend, weak defense, godless, etc.  

  •  Yes On Activism But Disagree on Star Power: (0+ / 0-)

    I regularly see footage of JFK, FDR and MLK, and for my money Obama is not up to their plane.

    Granted he is an excellent motivational speaker but he mainly appears to be a star by comparison to the motivationally dim bulbs who have come to dominate our leadership.

    Obama's abilities to both motivate and defend easily against stupid attacks used to be common for politicians, and his example could easily change the expectations not just of voters but of other politicians for the better.

    Obama represents the kind of development that raises the competition bar everywhere. We could see an increase in new more-competent, competitive candidates, and we could see an improvement in many of the reps we've already got.

    I've been part of such a transformation in a long-dispirited community in another sphere. It can be very dramatic, and in 4-5 years it becomes almost impossible to describe or remember what the former dysfunction was even like.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 10:02:17 AM PDT

  •  Nice diary... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    N in Seattle

    like you I've stuck with Dean and the DNC because of the 50 state strategy. How sweet it is to see it bear progressive fruit!

Permalink | 14 comments